Repubblika Repubblika Logo Repubblika Logo
  • CONTENT
    • Home
    • Press Releases
    • Publications
    • Projects
      • Projects
      • Youth in Connection
      • S-Info
      • RESTART
    • Campaigns
      • Active & Responsible Citizenship
        • Active & Responsible Citizenship
        • Declaration of Principles
        • Videos 2021
        • Competition 2021
        • Competition 2025
        • Donate to fund this project
    • Events
      • Art Installation
      • Public Conference on Free Speech and the Protection of Journalists
    • Video Archives
      • Documentary
      • Protest
      • Seminar
      • Vigil
      • Webinar
      • Educational Campaign
      • Proposals
    • Careers
    • General Meetings
      • AGM 2020
        • Email to Members
        • Nominations & Appointments
        • President’s Speech
      • AGM 2023
        • Email to Members
      • AGM 2024
        • President's Speech
      • SGM 2024
        • Appointment of Nominations Committee
        • Email to Members
        • Email to Members
      • AGM 2025
        • Email to Members
        • Notice by the Nominations Committee
        • Email to Members
        • Annual Administrative Report
    • Statute
    • Executive Committee
  • Donations
  • Membership
    • Renew Subscription
    • Membership Form
    • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • MaltiMalti

6. Measures that could have avoided the risk to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s life

29th January 2021

By Repubblika

5.4 What was the duty of the State in this context?

5.4 What was the duty of the State in this context?

6.1 Inadequate investigation of prior crimes

6.1 Inadequate investigation of prior crimes

The Inquiry is also being asked to determine whether the State failed to take measures within the scope of its powers which, judged reasonably, it might have been expected to take in order to avoid the risk to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s life.

« 5.4 What was the duty of the State in this context?
6.1 Inadequate investigation of prior crimes »
  • Public Inquiry into the assassination of Daphne Caruana Galizia
  • Executive Summary
  • 1. Repubblika
  • 1.1 The immediate aftermath of Daphne’s killing
  • 1.2 The failure of civil society
  • 1.3 Since Daphne was killed
  • 2. Terms of reference
  • 3. Concentric circles
  • 3.1 A series of car bombings
  • 3.2 A commissioned murder
  • 4. Impunity for the powerful
  • 4.1 Dismantling the barriers of restraint
  • 4.2 John Dalli
  • 4.3 Pilatus Bank
  • 4.4 The Panama Papers
  • 4.5 Henley & Partners
  • 4.6 Fuel and other smuggling
  • 4.7 ITS-site concession
  • 4.8 Vexatious legal action by Chris Cardona
  • 5. Preventing immediate risk to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s life
  • 5.1 Systematic threats initiated by people in positions of political power
  • 5.2 Mobilisation of the media
  • 5.3 Online trolling
  • 5.4 What was the duty of the State in this context?
  • 6. Measures that could have avoided the risk to Daphne Caruana Galizia’s life
  • 6.1 Inadequate investigation of prior crimes
  • 6.2 Independent assessment of risk
  • 6.3 Failure to provide appropriate security
  • 6.4 The State and independent media
  • 6.5 International interest
  • 7. Effective criminal law provisions
  • 7.1 A mafia crime
  • 7.2 Anti-mafia legislation
  • 7.3 Federal law enforcement for federal crimes
  • 7.4 Unexplained wealth
  • 7.5 Defeating or obstructing the course of justice
  • 7.6 Abuse of and misconduct in office
  • 7.7 Campaign finance
  • 7.8 Whistleblower protection
  • 7.9 Fighting corruption
  • 7.10 Inadequate institutional framework
  • 7.11 “The country deserves justice”
  • 8. The utility of public inquiries
  • 8.1 This Inquiry in context
  • 8.2 Further Inquiry needed
  • 9. Measures to protect journalists
  • 10. Our concerns today
  • 11. ‘Daphne’ should not be a controversy

Repubblika
29, Pjazza tal-Knisja
Mqabba MQB 1011
Malta
✉ [email protected]

Copyright © 2025 Repubblika
|
Design by Repubblika
|
Powered by Cloud1500